In Reply to: "Okay,,,highly directed and creative but a hint deficiency" posted by keith on January 28, 2005 at 10:23:16

Good thoughts.

I certainly don't agree with everything on that thread...just was interested in his math and stress on duality as per Schwarzschild and GR.

One important point though; Although the Planck Realm is sub microscopic, extensive laboratory work over the past 100 years does firmly support the concept that the universe is a quantum reality, though quantum effects only dominate at the lower scales of the universe.

The vastness of the numbers of events and sets of events (relating to information)emerging from (photonic) and decending into (the singular) planck realm creates, when observed, a none the less deterministic situation where the overall behavior of particles and their derivatives can be predicted with a high degree of accuracy approaching certainty.

A unitary universe has no internal dimensionality, only mass below the level of particulation, in an absolute sense below about 10 to the minus 36th CM.

At higher scales the familiar and some unfamiliar dimensional frameworks exist as they are observed by resulting particulate beings, through whose measuremnts, the size and mass of the planck realm can also be determined.

Again let me stress...a lot of work has been done on this, and even though quantum effects are not so noticable at the higher scales, they can be measured with sensitive instruments.

About that saddle:

In geometry "the saddle" usually refers to an infinite 4D universe with open space. Since it is clear for many reasons that the universe is finite in mass, and space in the universe has experimentally been shown to be closed, infering duality, stablity, inverse mapping and higher dimensionality, a determined effort to stay "in the saddle, or to go back to the saddle again" may be an indication of a certain philosophical bias.

• Dates from 2001 - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/26/2005 (68563-1-9)
• Re: Dates from 2001 - keith 1/28/2005 (68568-2-8)
• » Okay,,,highly directed and creative but a hint deficiency - keith 1/28/2005 (68570-3-7)
• « Needless to say... - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68585-4-1)
• A Unitary Universe Has no Internal Dimensionality....Strings? - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68588-5-0)
• I can see you are "into it"; try this one...this IS the Hawking - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/28/2005 (68571-4-4)
• Back in the Saddle...again? Postscript from Ned Wrights - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68580-5-3)
• The horse is dark energy and the saddle is flat - keith 1/29/2005 (68581-6-2)
• Excellent summary material... - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68586-7-1)
• The Horse...Dark Energy - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68587-8-0)