In Reply to: "Needless to say..." posted by Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on January 29, 2005 at 17:49:50

7D cosmology is very "stringy" but string theory is still a hypothetical explanation for the storage and presumed conservation of information within the Planck region. String Theory is attractive in a way because of its 4D microscopic projection, the DNA molecule which stores the genetic code.

However, while lower dimensional geometric projections are clues to the higher dimensional reality, they always break down somewhere...they have a kind of "horizon" beyond which they cannot go...in fact they can misslead us if we are careless.

Waterfalls have a stationary frame, they demonstrate change in appearance by their variation in flow, and they reflect the cyclic water cycle. They even slowly migrate upstream, demonstrating gradual coordinate shift. However, nothing in 4D exists eternally. A waterfall is just a projection of the higher dimensional stucture of the universe. It is observed and exists for us in 4D, not 7 and up.

I believe strings are a similar situation. Because our 4D frame is an invariant projection of the 7D and up reality, we ourselves occupy a special place in space and time forever. Like cosmic pieces of furniture, we just are.

Our conscous experience is like ripples from a stone thrown in a pond, passing over our eternal being and giving us the experience of life, motion and change...the world we know.

In such a universe, we ourselves are the information! Why is there a need for what is to become our bodies to be stored in the Planck Realm? Time, as Einstein said so well, is but an illusion, so why must we feel obligated to describe the universe in terms of motion and change? At its heart, information just IS; it exists eternally at invariant coordinates.

Actual development in a quasi-static universe takes place in the slightly changing events and decisions of our lives, which combined with all other effects of the complexity of life, gradually overcomes chaos and swings the universe toward order. We ourselves are the scafholding on which the periodic single time process future is built.

• Dates from 2001 - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/26/2005 (68563-1-9)
• Re: Dates from 2001 - keith 1/28/2005 (68568-2-8)
• Okay,,,highly directed and creative but a hint deficiency - keith 1/28/2005 (68570-3-7)
• » Needless to say... - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68585-4-1)
• « A Unitary Universe Has no Internal Dimensionality....Strings? - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68588-5-0)
• I can see you are "into it"; try this one...this IS the Hawking - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/28/2005 (68571-4-4)
• Back in the Saddle...again? Postscript from Ned Wrights - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68580-5-3)
• The horse is dark energy and the saddle is flat - keith 1/29/2005 (68581-6-2)
• Excellent summary material... - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68586-7-1)
• The Horse...Dark Energy - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 1/29/2005 (68587-8-0)