|
|
|
|
| Posted by
Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on March 01, 2005 at 19:43:12 (Message posted from "unknown" at 64.12.116.195) - explanation In Reply to: "Re: Note: "Megaverse" not "Multiverse"" posted by keith on March 01, 2005 at 13:22:18
Hi Keith, The wife and I flew to Florida last week just ahead of the snow which went up the eastern seaboard last Thursday. I'm using another persons laptop. I'll post the math on this when I return to Philly in a couple of weeks. It is really startling. On a larger scale than the solar system, the actual time (space) since the big bang is now known to a much higher degree of accuracy than a few years ago. I plan to work with some guys and gals to check the data we did a few years ago against the cosmic picture to see if we are within an order of magnitude or so. I'll keep you advised. I recently had an exchange with a geometry/GR specialist who was very encouraging about a modified Schwarzschild geometry fitting a quasi-static GR/QM universe model with a Planck Realm- and its corresponding mass- rather than having a geometric point at the center of the dual geometry. Thanks for your interesting posts- and professional, polite comments based on I'm open. If the model isn't right- so what? Life goes on. To date, however, the model has not been disproved, in fact there is a lot of evidence at both the astronomical and submicroscopic levels supporting it. The model sure answers a lot of important questions! Best Wishes... Sam Cox |
| Topic Thread: |
|
Followup postings for this message are closed. |