|
|
|
|
| Posted by
Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on March 15, 2005 at 16:49:53 (Message posted from "unknown" at 68.45.160.182) - explanation In Reply to: "Can two fermions be in the same state?" posted by Swing Low on March 15, 2005 at 12:16:18
The Pauli exclusion principle is pretty basic particle physics! It is the standard explanation for the failure of electron clouds to instantly collapse into the nucleus! A careful study of asymetric and symetric states in particle physics will give the observer some sub-atomic hints (in addition to impressive atronomical evidence) as to reasons why a dual universe is so likely...that antimatter and matter can- in fact must- exist closely in order for the particulate baryonic universe to exist. In additon to mass, particulate diferences are related to spin, which in turn is is related to topology and geometric inversion...or as particle physicists say: up-or down! In a dual universe we do not walk backwards. We walk forward in geometric inversion just as we walk "forward" in this universe. Time process is inviolate. The difference of course, is that because space is closed, the other hemisphere is experienced in generally decreasing entropy whereas our hemisphere is observed in generally increasing entropy. Pauli's exclusion principle rather begs the question as to why electons do not immediately collapse to the nucleus. It gives a quantum mechanical explanation for what we observe, but is essentially a statement that something does happen, and is somewhat lacking conceptually. If the real reason for the stability of the information at the sub-atomic level...atoms, particles and electron clouds is, as I suspect, related to time dilation formulae in GR, getting a full conceptual understanding of the stability of the proton and atomic structure in general will only be fully understood as: 1. We understand that cosmologically the universe is quasi-static...rigid. We ARE the information- the universe must be understood at the bottom line in the light of eternity, not time, and thus it is not necessary to look for information stored in a black hole, and In this scenario, gravity is a ficticious force created by a multiple of hemispheric particulate spin forces observed in time dilation. The very unstable atom seems stable for the same reason a drop of water approaching a liquid interface seems suspended almost forever in a slow motion film of the event. Photon compression and rotation approaching 4D event horizons produces forms we call "electron clouds", "energy levels", "atomic particles", "matter" and "mass" in sequence (Einstein's famous forumla). Finally, I do not believe this posting og yours is coincidental. You are definately following these recent threads on the forum and are very knowledeable. I think science really is close to a basic conceptual understanding of the link between quantum mechanics, SRT and GR...and of the basic stucture of reality. However an enormous amount of work remains as we "flesh out", develop and explore the technological implications of what we have on our hands here. |
| Topic Thread: |
|
Followup postings for this message are closed. |