69114 - Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works
Reload Page | Topic Thread | Post a Followup | The Hawking Forum | Search | FAQ
Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point
Posted by Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on April 09, 2005 at 16:05:27
(Message posted from "unknown" at 64.12.116.196) - explanation

In Reply to: "I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works" posted by keith on April 09, 2005 at 09:47:27

There is some great basic stuff you posted here including an article by Sean Carroll, who works with Dr. Michael Turner at the University of Chicago.

You may remember that I mentioned Dr Turner had actually calculated the radius of the closed, hyperspherical universe using the WMAP Omega Total of 1.02. That department is very busy investigating cosmological models at this time, as are the folks at UNC, UCLA, U Penn, The University of Manchester UK and Cambridge UK.

Dr. Carroll mentions only two possible, plausible causes of acceleration outward and higher dimensionality is one. Vacuum energy raises more questions than it answers, and as I said, I'm skeptical about the idea conceptually.

In the dual universe existing on two 4D tracks with a single time process and inverse mapping, all forces, including gravity, acceleration outward and probably even the phenomenon we interperet from our frame as "particulation" on 4D event horizon surfaces are (or create)ficticious forces which we observe by virtue of our coodinates in the system as "vacuum energy", gravity or chemical substances.

Remember that matter and energy are forms of the same thing...concentrated energy is matter.
At the edge of the planck realm, the last thing incoming photons do is compress, particulate- and appear from our frame to become stationary..."particulate"...light stops compresses and has no speed at singularity.

In the higher D scenario, because of dualism, the rapid proper time collapse of the cosmos is read in time dilation, which from our frame "creates" space and time in all its vastness.

Note how this fits SRT like a glove. I told Ben that a photon coming out of my lamp is entangled with a photon emerging from a lamp on the other side of the universe. In the dual model the two lamps are superposed and inversely mapped, so the photon coming out of one is obviously entangled with the other, though, for our purposes the two lamps are also the radius of the universe away from each other...on the other side of the Planck Realm.

There is now a vast array of laboratory evidence showing that photons are indeed entangled as SRT and the Lorentz Transformation ultimately infer.

Wave particle duality is tied right up conceptually in all this...and duality...cross-reading the information in time dilation fits in too. The observed speed of light from our frame is ultimately derivable from a proper mathematical treatment of the model.

SNAP is still in the planning stages, so I guess any information we get from it as to Cosmic acceleration and dark energy is some years away. Dr. Ned Wright made a pitch on his site for all those interested, and who realize the importance of this work to contact their governmental representatives! He has been appointed to the committee working on the project.

Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point
Topic Thread:
Followup postings for this message are closed.

Reload Page | Topic Thread | Post a Followup | The Hawking Forum | Search | FAQ
Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point