|
|
|
|
| Posted by
Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on April 10, 2005 at 08:28:59 (Message posted from "unknown" at 64.12.116.196) - explanation In Reply to: "Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works" posted by T.S. on April 10, 2005 at 02:50:00
I'm sorry you saw my post as a kind of "put down". It is clear that you really want to understand my "BS" and make some sense of it! Albert Einstein's theories started with a concept...a geometric picture in his head. When these predictions were compared with very precise measurements...there was a match. Previously observed observational discrepancies were explained. Bohr and others likewise conceptualized the universe as a completely quantatized entity from the bottom of scale to the top. Their quantum mechanical theory likewise made precise predictions which could be and were tested in the laboratory with great success. Quantum effects dominate the observed universe at the smaller scales as observed from our frame. As the scale increases, their observed effect on reality seems (as we observe it) to diminish, but nevertheless quantum effects can be measured even at macroscopic scales. Some people, including Einstein, felt and feel that QM and SRT/GR are incompatable conceptually. They are not, however seeing the relationship between these ideas does require a special ability to conceive how they complement each other, and then, based on observations, put SRT/GR and QM in an appropriate geometric model which unifies the concepts. Einstein realized for many good reasons, that a universe in higher than 4D would not particulate. He therefore concluded (a bit hastily and emotionally) that the universe could not exist in a higher geometry than 4D. I guess he didn't himself conceptualize that the universe might be observed on two, not one 4D tracks and thus particulate in two ways. Even Einstein during those days regarded singulaity as a matter of geometry...vestigial and not an actual massive part of the structure of the universe. Dirac predicted the existence of antimatter, but he knew that matter and antimatter were incompatable, so he failed to develop a dual universe himself. Einstein was stonewalled by the failure of higher than 4D universes to particulate. Dirac was stopped by his knowledge that matter and antimatter were incompatable, so he proposed an infinate floor of particles, now thought to be "quantum fluctuations" at the engineering floor of the universe. To Einstein and Diracs credit as I just said, neither felt that the singular realm was any more than a mathematical artifact of the model. The discovery of quantum theory was the first breakthough...a Plank Realm below which the universe is massive (not geometric singularity) but non-particulate. The fact that 70% of the universe could suddenly be seen to be non-particulate was an important clue in cosmology. Remember Einstein realized the universe could not particulate in higher than 4D...suddenly 70% of the universe didn't HAVE to be particulate! Conceptually, the fact that most of the universe is non-particulate in nature led to the second conceptual breakthrough and opened the door to linking SRT/GR and QM. Structually, a finite, quasi-static, almost rigid universe with two three-spaces and a single time dimension could exist, NOT on quantum fluctuations, but in superposition with the antimatter Dirac originally predicted...with time separation via the Planck Realm (rather than a geometric point) inherent in the geometry. Matter and antimatter COULD be superposed! Since the universe is an entity, the mass of the Baryonic matter in both three spaces could be detected (Jan Oort) but each three space "hemisphere" would be "over the horizon" from the other. Space is not empty! The Planck Realm is everywhere- and massive. This realm occupies a certain geometric locastion within the universal geometry. Planck Realm singularity explains even the anomolous acceleration of the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft! We read one particulate side of the universe from the other in time dilation. Photons by definition and experiment are universally entangled, so reading one side from the other becomes conceptually possible. In this configuration, the universe is a rapidly pulsating energy mass, particulating on 4D event horizon surfaces at the edge of the planck realm- and read within the energy matrix by living things remotely in time dilation. As a whole, the universe is rigid- quasi-static...an almost infinite set of invariant frames. This brings me to a final thought. Most people cannot even conceptualize a 4D "surface", let alone a bi-particulate mirror geometry in 7 foundational dimensions! His ability to conceptualize a universe in 4D made Einstein, Einstein. The ability to conceptualize a universe completely quanticized and the implications of that as observed at different scales made Bohr, Bohr. Ned Wright assets on his site that Einsteins static (or presumably the quasi-static configuration) is wrong. I suspect that Einstein's intuition was right and Ned Wright is wrong. I posted an item on this forum entitled "Olbers paradoz...Isn't". That post explains why I believe Einstein was conceptually right and Ned Wright is conceptually wrong. The universe IS filling up with Photons as observed from our frame. However it is not filled with them at the frame we happen to observe it, only at the "big Bang", Schwarzschilds "photonic antipode". I could speak about Stephen Hawkings magnificent contribution to the 7D geometry...his "bean shaped" entropy reversing antipode, but space is limited here. Kip Thorne said his geometry teacher swore at the kids and made them toe the line, but he clearly explaned geometry. The secret of the universe is in conceptual understanding. The secret to conceptual understanding is in an understanding of geometry and the actual relationships and geometry expressed in complex mathematiucal formulae. Once we understand the concept, the reason why an automobile and a key fall with the same acceleration from identical positions with repect to the center of the Earth is no longer a mystery to us. |
| Topic Thread: |
|
Followup postings for this message are closed. |