Good Point!

69131 - Good Point!

Posted by Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on April 11, 2005 at 16:08:35
(Message posted from "unknown" at 64.12.116.196) - explanation

In Reply to: "Spacetime singularity shell frame" posted by keith on April 10, 2005 at 08:30:07

You are absolutely correct...no need for extra dimensions, no need is implicit in that particular conceptual aspect, anyway. In fact, the bottom line is that the universe particulates and can only (so far as we can determine) be observed in 4 dimensions at one time.

Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point

Topic Thread:

So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - keith 4/07/2005 (69090-1-16)

Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - Charlie 4/08/2005 (69102-2-1)

Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - keith 4/09/2005 (69107-3-0)

Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/07/2005 (69094-2-13)

I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - keith 4/09/2005 (69106-3-12)

Astro-data it is or we wait until new Europe LHCollider in 2007 - keith 4/09/2005 (69115-4-1)

(nt) sigh (nt) - keith 4/09/2005 (69116-5-0)

Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/09/2005 (69114-4-9)

Unethical .... - Bruce 4/10/2005 (69125-5-0)

ť Spacetime singularity shell frame - keith 4/10/2005 (69121-5-3)

Ť Good Point! - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/11/2005 (69131-6-2)

Re: Good Point! - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/11/2005 (69132-7-1)

Bad point... - Bruce 4/12/2005 (69133-8-0)

Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - T.S. 4/10/2005 (69119-5-2)

Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/10/2005 (69120-6-1)

PS - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/10/2005 (69122-7-0)

Thanks Sam. Looks good on paper. I'll go read some Ned (nt) - keith 4/09/2005 (69118-5-0)

Followup postings for this message are closed.