In Reply to: "Good Point!" posted by Samuel A. (Sam) Cox on April 11, 2005 at 16:08:35

Note that the "dark energy", the vehicle for conservation, is itself global, and massive.
In total, the dark energy, or global cosmic abyss which contains 73% of the mass of the universe is equal as measured spatially from our frame to a black hole with a radius 1/10 to the minus 33rd of 13.6 BLY using any equivalent units.

Note: since we "read" the universe just above the cosmic abyss, the correct figure for experimental purposes may be closer to 10 to the minus 40th, but even using -33 brings us close enough that we can see the handwriting on the wall mathematically.

Thus it can be seen that the Planck Realm has geometric properties with respect to the GR universe, a conceptually unifying characteristic of SRT/GR and QM.

Hence, I placed the Planck Realm at the center of the Schwarzschild mirror geometry to match observation and fill a mathematical gap thought to be an appendage before the confirmation of black hole existence.

The biparticlate nature of the model solves the engineering problem encountered by Dirac, using topology, the nature of the planck Realm as the basis for stable superposition, and keeping in mind the nature of the photon as defined in SRT.,.in reading the information remotely in time dilation.

Duality is a separate idea from the one you very well describe, since particulation occurs only in 4D in any viable cosmology. The beauty of the 7D model is that it is stable, finite and hyperspherical in the best Einsteinian sense.

Since GR/SRT and QM reign, and all determinations of the Omega have been 1+, I think I have very reasonable basis, with all the body of astronomical evidence to consider the possibility of a dual megaverse with a single, single process time dimension.

Keith, you know what Error bars are for and how they are used. Given the fact that every credible experiment, Maxima, Boomerang, WMAP etc etc has resulted in an omega tot greater than one, and given that even the smallest deviation from flat in the geometry of space will result in an ultimate rapid closure, what can any reasonable person think?

• So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - keith 4/07/2005 (69090-1-16)
• Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - Charlie 4/08/2005 (69102-2-1)
• Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - keith 4/09/2005 (69107-3-0)
• Re: So we await the forthcoming refined supernovae data - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/07/2005 (69094-2-13)
• I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - keith 4/09/2005 (69106-3-12)
• Astro-data it is or we wait until new Europe LHCollider in 2007 - keith 4/09/2005 (69115-4-1)
• (nt) sigh (nt) - keith 4/09/2005 (69116-5-0)
• Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/09/2005 (69114-4-9)
• Unethical .... - Bruce 4/10/2005 (69125-5-0)
• Spacetime singularity shell frame - keith 4/10/2005 (69121-5-3)
• » Good Point! - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/11/2005 (69131-6-2)
• « Re: Good Point! - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/11/2005 (69132-7-1)
• Bad point... - Bruce 4/12/2005 (69133-8-0)
• Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - T.S. 4/10/2005 (69119-5-2)
• Re: I dont know--Theres much data compilation in the works - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/10/2005 (69120-6-1)
• PS - Samuel A. (Sam) Cox 4/10/2005 (69122-7-0)
• Thanks Sam. Looks good on paper. I'll go read some Ned (nt) - keith 4/09/2005 (69118-5-0)