84264 - Re: Obama Care

Reload Page | Topic Thread | Post a Followup | The Hawking Forum | Search | FAQ
Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point

Posted by Ben Tsutomu Ito on April 08, 2012 at 12:52:28
(Message posted from "unknown" at 137.150.101.92) - explanation

In Reply to: "Obama Care" posted by Ben Ito on April 08, 2012 at 12:39:10

In the Supreme Court Case, Moore vs. Obama. It is argued that the affordable care act violates US constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2], commerce clause.
.
.
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;
.
Health Care does not fit the definition of Commerce since Health care cannot be represent by the exchange, buying or selling of commodites involving transportation form place to place. Health care cannot be transported from place to place, as a commodity, such as apples or oranges; therefore, this lawsuit based on US constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2], commerce clause is invalid.



Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point

Topic Thread:
  • Obama Care - Ben Ito 4/08/2012 (84262-1-2)
    • Re: Obama Care - Ben Tsutomu Ito 4/08/2012 (84264-2-0)
Post a Followup

Username:       Save Profile:       See the FAQ for info on
Password:       Save Cookie:       how to use Identity Profiles.

Name:  
E-Mail (Optional):      No Autoreply
Subject:  
Message:  
URL (Optional):  
URL Title (Opt.):  
Image URL (Opt.):  
AdBot Screening: