84266 - Re: f

Reload Page | Topic Thread | Post a Followup | The Hawking Forum | Search | FAQ
Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point

Posted by e on April 08, 2012 at 13:12:46
(Message posted from "unknown" at 137.150.101.92) - explanation

In Reply to: "f" posted by b on April 08, 2012 at 13:07:26

In the Supreme Court Case, Moore vs. Obama, and the other related Supreme Court cases are based on the argument that the affordable care act violates US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2], (commerce clause).
.
.
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;(Art.I, sec. 8, clause 3).
.
Health Care does not fit the definition of Commerce since Health care cannot be represent by the exchange, buying or selling of commodites involving transportation form place to place. Health care cannot be transported from place to place, as a commodity, such as, apples or oranges; therefore, this lawsuit based on Article I, US Const., Section 8, Clause 3:[2], (commerce clause) is invalid.


Back in Thread | Next in Thread | Back by Number | Next by Number | Back to Entry Point

Topic Thread:
  • f - b 4/08/2012 (84265-1-9)
    • Re: f - e 4/08/2012 (84266-2-8)
      • Re: f - b 4/08/2012 (84267-3-7)
        • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84269-4-0)
        • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84268-4-5)
          • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84272-5-0)
          • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84271-5-2)
            • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84273-6-1)
              • Re: f - bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb 4/08/2012 (84274-7-0)
          • Re: f - f 4/08/2012 (84270-5-0)
Post a Followup

Username:       Save Profile:       See the FAQ for info on
Password:       Save Cookie:       how to use Identity Profiles.

Name:  
E-Mail (Optional):      No Autoreply
Subject:  
Message:  
URL (Optional):  
URL Title (Opt.):  
Image URL (Opt.):  
AdBot Screening: