Posted by
f on April 08, 2012 at 13:22:27
(Message posted from "unknown" at 137.150.101.92) - explanation
In Reply to: "Re: f" posted by b on April 08, 2012 at 13:15:45
In the Supreme Court Case, Moore vs. Obama, and the other related Supreme Court cases (11-398, 11-393.....) are based on the argument that the Affordable Care Act (HR 3962) violates US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:[2], (commerce clause).
.
.
"[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;" (Art.I, sec. 8, clause 3).
.
.
Health Care does not fit the definition of Commerce since Health care cannot be represented by the exchange, buying or selling of a commodity involving in the transportation from place to place. Health care cannot be transported from place to place, as a commodity, such as, apples or oranges; therefore, these lawsuit before the US Supreme Court, based on Article I, US Const., section 8, Clause 3:[2], (commerce clause) are invalid.
|
Post a Followup