f on April 08, 2012 at 15:47:54|
(Message posted from "unknown" at 184.108.40.206) - explanation
In Reply to: "Re: f" posted by f on April 08, 2012 at 13:19:02
In the Supreme Court Case, Moore vs. Obama, and the other related Supreme Court cases (11-398, 11-393.....) are based on the argument that the Affordable Care Act (HR 3962) violates US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3:, (commerce clause).
"[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes;" (Art.I, sec. 8, clause 3).
Health Care does not fit the definition of a commodity since Health care cannot be represent by the exchange, buying or selling of commodites involving transportation form place to place. Health care cannot be transported from place to place, as a commodity, such as, apples or oranges; therefore, this lawsuit based on Article I, US Const., Section 8, Clause 3:, (commerce clause) is invalid. In addition, the anti-Injuction Act(USC Sec. 7421) is based on Commerce.