Couldn't open words file ./redneck/words.txt: No such file or directory Content-type: text/html Universally Translated: Gahrie's Grumbles and Groans .comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Gahrie's Grumbles and Groans

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Miss America 2010

Congratulations to our new Miss America for 2010, Caressa Cameron.














Now, at the risk of being indelicate, we have obviously reached the point where it is no big deal for a Black woman to win the Miss America pageantAnyone want to bet on the chances of a White woman winning the Miss Black America pageant, or the existence of a Miss White America pageant?

It is long past time for separatist organizations like Miss Black America to go by the wayside.

Edit: Linked at The Other McCain

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Short Answer? - Yes!

OK..The Leftwing wackos and Kossacks have already been frothing at the mouthIt's very amusing to see them questioning the experience of a candidate for national officeNot only did the Democratic Party lose its sense of humor, they have lost their ability to sense hypocrisy.

But Govpalin has been attacked form the right alsoDavid Frum is typical: "If it were your decision, and you were putting your country first, would you put an untested small-town mayor a heartbeat away from the presidency?"

In a word, yesI am tired of politics dominated by a professional political classI want people who have actually done things, run businesses, met a payroll, paid taxes and yes served on the PTAI want real people involvedLet's look at what she has done:

1) Cut spending, both as mayor and governor.
2) Cut taxes, both as mayor and governor.
3) Made real reforms, and attacked corruption, both as mayor and governor.
4) Been willing to defy and oppose the party machine.
5) Defeated the immediately prior Republican and Democratic governor in her election to governor.

On my high school list someone came on and praised SenObamaI asked them: What has Obama accomplished besides managing to get electedto the Illinois Senate, U.SSenate and then nominated for presidentThe only answer they came up with is that he got into Harvard as a Black man from a single parent familyWtH? First of all, he is as much White as BlackMore really, he was raised primarily by his White grandparents (not a single mother) in Hawaii where race is much less of a concern than most placesSecond, as stated, he was not raised by a single motherHis mother remarried quite quickly, and for most of his life he was actually raised by his grandparentsLastly, surely he will proudly admit that he got into Harvard through Affirmative Action (AA), given his views on AA and his statements about Justice Thomas? So how tough was that? What did he do at Harvard?

He has not stayed in a job longer than four years, has no legislative record to speak of (and what he does have is known to have been drafted by his Chicago mentor and given to him), was given the nickname "MrPresent" for his perfiormance in the Illinois Senate, has been constantly running for office since entering politics and submerged himself with the Chicago and National Democratic Political machines.

The only thing he has done is read speeches off a teleprompter well.

I'll put GovPalin's experience against SenObama's anytime, anywhere.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

I Really Don't Know What To Think About This........

One of my principals asked me about this video at work todayIt's been playing on BET lately.


Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Speedy Gonzalez

I just saw a music video on a Spanish language channel (KMEX) called Speedy Gonzalez by a group called the Kumbia All StarsHere it is:




I mentioned earlier that I had seen a commercial on Spanish language television using him.



Does this mean we white , English speakers can resume watching the Speedy Gonzalez cartoons now? Can Lays bring back the Frito Bandito?

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, July 01, 2007

Racism

I got called racist again todayThis time it was because I think everyone should be treated equally, and I want to end race based preferences(Yes, I know it doesn't make sense to me either.) It happened online, and I will never meet the person making the insult, so it really shouldn't bother me, but it does.

I mean how can you defend youself from such a defamation? If you deny it, it quickly turns into a childish "Am not" "Are too" argument.

If I respond with facts from my life (My best friend is a Black man married to a White woman, my three closest co-workers are two Black women and another Black man married to a White woman, in college my closest friends at USC were an Iranian-American and a Black man and at Cal State a Hispanic woman and her White eventual husband) I sound like I am making the tired old "some of my best friends are Black" argument.

It's just extremely frustrating and I wish I could come up with an effective response.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Race Traitors.....

Hablas Espanol?

Jessica Alba doesn’tIs there anything wrong with that? Apparently so.


The third-generation American and actress is under fire this week from fellow Latinos for comments she made to Para Todos magazine:

"Alba is my last name and I'm proud of thatBut that's itMy grandparents were born in California, the same as my parents, and though I may be proud of my last name, I'm AmericanThroughout my whole life, I've never felt connected to one particular race or heritage, nor did I feel accepted by anyIf you break it down, I'm less Latina than Cameron Diaz, whose father is CubanBut people don't call her Latina because she's blonde…"

Labels: ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Nigger Please!

Labels: , ,

Saturday, April 14, 2007

A New Leader For Black America

The ONLY good thing to come out of this whole Imus fiasco is the emergence of Jason Whitlock into the national spotlight.

He has written two brave and insightful columns about this tempest in a teapot, here and here.

He has also appeared on Tucker Carlson's show on MSNBC, the TV network who kicked Imus off their airwaves.

Labels: , ,

Why Should We Give A Damn What Al Sharpton Thinks?

Don Imus should have told Sharpton to kiss his assWhy everyone kneels at the feet of this race-baiter I will never knowIf you don't know the true history of this jerk, this is a pretty good place to start.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Dred Scott

Today is the 150th anniversary of one of the US Supreme Court's worst decisions, Scott V Sanford.

Tell me again how important stare decisis is.

Labels: , , ,

Old Negro Space Program

I first saw this over a year ago, but I was just reminded of it recentlyTruly one of the classics of the internet.....


Labels: ,

Monday, March 05, 2007

Katrina Victims Evacuate Trailer Park

Jesus Christ! Katrina hit New Orleans in August of 2005! It was over 18 months ago! How much longer are these "victims" going to live off the government teat? Are you going to tell me that you couldn't get a job and a place to live for your family after 18 months?

I'm going to make some predictions, and many of you are going to call me a racist for it.

At least 90% of those still in the FEMA trailers are on welfare.

At least 90% of them are second generation welfare recipients.....and I bet a sizeable majority have never had a steady job.

10 years from now, there will still be Katrina "victims" living in FEMA trailers, and bitching about how bad the government is treating them.

Labels: , , ,

Link

Friday, December 29, 2006

Althouse VS The Liberty Fund Symposium

The brouhaha over the Liberty Fund symposium about Frank SMeyer and the issue of federalism continues(here and here)

In her latest post, Althouse clarifies that her main objection was the fact that some Libertarians are willing to allow private businesses to discriminate on the basis of race.

But I had brought up the subject of discrimination by private business-owners,
which was roundly defended at the table in the name of restricting government to
the most minimal level of intrusion on the individual, in hardcore,
true-believer libertarian style(Believe me, the readings expressed the most
morbid fear of government you can imagine.)

What is confusing to me however, that this arguement that she finds so objectionable when it concerns the right of free association (and possible discrimination) is exactly the same arguement that she (and most of those on the Left) find so persuasive when it is applied to the issue of abortionApparently she believes it is a far greater ethical, moral and legal offense to discriminate against someone based on their race than it is to kill an innocent life.

Althouse's position appears to me to be a perfect example of my two main thesis about the Left today.

1) The Left's strategy is to constantly place the Right on the defensive.

2) The Left is completely blind when it commits to noticing their blatant and persistent hypocrisy.

This only goes to show you those among the Kossack moonbats who attack Althouse as being a rightwinger have no idea of what they are talking about.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Does Only the Right Have a Responsibility to Repudiate?

Ann Althouse has recently written on her blog about attending a conference sponsored by the Liberty Fund about the writings of Frank SMeyerOne of the topics during the weekend was the issue of State's RightsMeyer supported the idea of federalism and State's Rights, and so did apparently many of the Libertarian and Conservative attendees of the conferenceAlthouse wrote:

I am struck ..by how deeply and seriously libertarians and conservatives believe in their ideasI'm used to the way lefties and liberals take themselves seriously and how deeply they believeMe, I find true believers strange and -- if they have power -- frightening.

During later posts and a running dialog with Jonah Goldberg she explains that this primarily refers to the fact that the libertarians and conservatives failed to recognize their responsibility to repudiate the real world (evil) effects that the ideology of State's Rights has hadIn effect she is arguing that since those who supported slavery and Jim Crow used the idea of State's Rights to support their position, every time someone rises to argue for the idea of State's Rights, they have a duty to repudiate slavery and Jim Crow.

Jonah Goldberg correctly rejects thisHe correctly identifies this as unfair to those on the Right, but fails to really develop any arguements to support his positionIn some comments submitted to Althouse's blog, I try to develop some of these missing arguements, and I'm going to extend them here.

1) First of all, the idea of State's Rights is literally fundamental to our RepublicOur whole system of government was predicated on the idea that the federal government was subordinate to the StatesThis is explicitly laid out in our ConstitutionThere was no arguement prior to the Civil War that the State's Rights position held primacy, and was seen as a moral goodIt is only after the Civil War that the idea of Nationalism takes control, and is seen as morally superiorFor the last 150, we have seen a struggle between these competing ideas, with the Right usually supporting State's Rights or federalism, and the Left supporting nationalism(an interesting aside: before the Civil War our nation was almost always referred to in the plural, the United States areAfter the Civil War it is almost exclusively the singular, the United States is.)

2) Our nation has been making compromises with the evil of slavery since before its foundingOur Constitution was forced to make accomodations for it, and some of the more important early pieces of legislation are compromises over the issueI argue that the taint on the idea of State's rights produced by the supporters of slavery (and later segregation) is just another one of these accomodations our nation has been forced to make.

3) This "duty" to repudiate also seems to be exclusively the purview of the RightIt is clearly a strategy of the Left to force the Right to behave defensively as much as possibleThus while the Right is forced to repudiate (and punishes) SenLott for his remarks apparently supporting racism, the Left is allowed to continue to support SenBiden and SenClinton after their blatently racist remarksIt is simply undeniable that no Republican could have survived making the kind of racist remarks that the two Democratic senators didRepublicans are forced to defend their handling of the Foley scandal, even though they forced Foley to resignYet few people in the national media brought up the case of Gerry Studds, who not only survived his much worse scandal and continued to serve as a Democrat in Congress, but was rewarded with a sub-committee chairmanshipWhen a Republican president attempted to obstruct justice while in office, he was forced to resign by RepublicansWhen a Democratic president attempted to obstruct justice while he was in office, the Democratic party defended himWhen a Conservative nominee for the Supreme Court was accused of sexual harassment, he was pilloried by the Left (specifically feminists such as NOW)When a Republican Senator was accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault, he was hounded out of office by the Left(specifically feminists such as NOW)When a Democratic president was proven to have committed sexual harassment and sexual assault, he was supported and defended by the Left(specifically feminists such as NOW) The outright and blatent hypocrisy of the Left in these cases is astounding, but yet the Left still manages to consistently force the Right to behave defensivelyAlthouse's position on State's Rights is just another example of this.

4) Other ideas have resulted in real world effects that are considered evilAlthouse herself cites the case of communism:

Imagine a left-wing conference going 9 hours talking about Karl Marx's ideas and disqualifying discussion of the evils wrought in the name of communism.

Well as I and another commentor point out in her comments, this is usually precisely what happensAs pointed out, the most repeated phrase ever uttered in the history of economic theory is: "true marxism has never been tried!"

I myself attempted to develop an arguement concerning abortion; and eugenicsThe Left embraces the premise that there is a fundamental Right to have an abortionMany of the early pioneers of the movement to legalize abortion believed in eugenics, and in using abortion to further their aimsMargaret Sanger, who founded the organization that would become Planned Parenthood, explicitly advocated using abortion to improve humanityToday, proponents of abortion make explicitly eugenic arguements to support abortionThe most frequent and widely approved arguement is that there would be millions more criminals today except for abortionThis arguement is set forth in the book FreakonomicsAs Ramesh Ponnuru points out in his book Party of Death, in a paper that eventually led to Freakonomics, it is acknowledged that the arguement is based on race:

abortion disproportionally effects Black children

crimes are committed disproportionally by Blacks

therefore crime is reduced by reducing the Black population

Imagine someone on the Right trying to make this arguementIt is explicitly racist and eugenicMany on the Left also point out that abortion reduces the number of handicapped children born as a justification for abortionAgain, this is an explicitly eugenic arguementIn the real world abortion disproportionally effects the poor and minorities, which is exactly what people like Sanger intended.

So we see the idea of a right to abortion not only resulting in real world eugenic effects, we also see the Left explicitly embracing these effects as a justification for abortionNo one on the Right embraced segregation as a justification for State's rights.

So, we are either left to assume that the Left sees eugenics as a positive good, or the Left ignoring the real world effects of an idea based on a "deep belief in an idea".

5) So my question for Althouse is:

Does the Left have to explicitly repudiate eugenics, and the real world eugenic effects of abortion, whenever they discuss, defend and support the idea of a right to abortion? If not, why not?







Labels: , ,

Saturday, December 16, 2006

How Bad Is It?

Can I just say that the state of current immigration law, and illegal immigration, combined with orgainizations such as CAIR and MEChA make me long for the days of the Alien and Sedition Acts?

Labels: , ,

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Maybe God Was Punishing New Orleans...

Fresh off re-electing Ray "what school buses?", "Chocolate City" Nagin , the people of New Orleans have re-elected William "cold cash" Jefferson.

And it's not just New Orleans, but Louisiana as a wholeThey supported Huey Long's corrupt regime for far too long, and they continue to re-elect the Landrieu dynasty.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, November 20, 2006

The Draft

A lot of people are hyperventilating about RepRangel's threats to re-instate the draft.

First of all, it is never going to happenThe Democrats are stupid, but they aren't that stupid.

Rangel's reason is supposedly so that the upper class elites (read: whitey) will have to share the "burden"Most people in the armed forces do not consider their service a burden, they consider it an honorIt has also been proven by independent studies that the armed forces are more white, and more educated than the general populationThe canard that the military is full of the poor, minority and uneducated is extremely outdated.

Second, the MSM (not surprisingly) and most bloggers (which surprises me) are all talking like 18 year old boys are going to have to start registeringThey are already supposed to be registeringThe "draft" or more accurately the Selective Service already existsRegistration was re-instated in 1980 by PresCarter(surprise surprise...another Democrat) However, only males are required (or even allowed) to registerI can't wait to see RepPelosi or SenClinton start talking about drafting young women.

What would change is that they would start holding lotteries again, and bring back conscriptionThe military would absolutely hate this.

Now I would go RepRangel one step further, and institute compulsory serviceDrafties would have the option of serving in the military, the Peace Corp or a domestic version of the Peace CorpI think youth should serve society in some way, and it would teach our youth something about discipline, self discipline and responsibility; lessons that most of them sorely need to learn.

Labels: ,

Thursday, July 20, 2006

It Just Gets Worse

First Rove goes to the La Raza convention, now PresBush goes to the NAACPWhat is next, Condi Rice going to a Klan rally?

Of course, some idiot starts heckling himThe NAACP is not only a racist organization, it's officials have made some very offensive remarks about PresBush personallyThey have called him a racist, associated him with people who dragged a black man to death, and called his administration the Taliban wing of AmericaAnd yet he saw fit to give the organization legitimacy it does not deserve, and pander to it by agreeing to signing the outdated and offensive Voting Rights Act.

When he embraced Julian Bond at the end, I nearly threw upJulian Bond is among the worst of the racists, and the worst of the rhetorical bomb throwers.

Once more politics wins out over principal.

Labels: ,

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Shame on you MrRove

Yesterday MrRove addressed a meeting of the National Council of La Raza, a racist organization that is brazen enough to blatantly call themselves "The Race" and openly advocate racist ideasThis is worse than addressing a Klan rally, because at least the Klan doesn't advocate treasonMost Republicans refuse to address the NAACP because of their racist and politically biased rhetoricLa Raza is worse than the NAACPOne day the Republican Party will look back at yesterday with immense shame, hopefully soon.

Unless the Republican nominee in 2008 openly repudiates this type of pandering to illegal immigrants and racists, the Republican Party just lost my vote in 2008.

Labels: ,

Sunday, April 02, 2006

More Political Correctness?

I just saw a Volkswagon commecial on a Spanish language television channel that was using a Speedy Gonzalez cartoon as a commercialBut heaven forbid that an English channel would actually show the cartoons, that would be racist!

Is this anything like only Black people being allowed to use the word nigger?

Quick, who has the rights to the Frito Bandito?

Labels: , ,